Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Student Chapter at
The Ohio State University
 

                10/05/05

Home
Up
Join Us
About Us
Links
News

10/5/05 Meeting Agenda

·              Welcome to the 2nd HFES student chapter meeting of 2005-2006
o Meet at 4.30 pm in Baker Systems 210E
o
Talk starts at 5.00 pm

·              Agenda:
o 
2005-2006 officer elections

      • announce the nominees

o Membership renewal/recruitment, membership dues

o Planning for future events/programs

        • carpool?
      • Visit to Farm Science Review: the tour to the universally designed kitchen and bath

o List Serve for the Student Chapter

o Coordinating events with Design Circle Student Org

·              Websites:

    • Student chapter at the OSU: http://hfes.org.ohio-state.edu/
    • Central Ohio Chapter:

http://www-iwse.eng.ohio-state.edu/ISEFaculty/sommerich/centralohhfes/

·              Guest speaker: Gregory Knapik (knapik.1@osu.edu)

    • Development of a Biomechanical Model for Assessing Pushing and Pulling Tasks

The makeup of industrial work has recently changed, favoring pushing and pulling with carts and other material handling devices instead of lifting.  Accordingly, pushing and pulling are now extremely prevalent in industry.  
Unfortunately, there are very few biomechanical models of sufficient complexity to accurately assess loads on the spine during pushing and pulling.  Most models are only two-dimensional, static, or rely on single-equivalent muscles.  In order to address the current void in biomechanical modeling, a three-dimensional, dynamic, EMG-assisted model was developed that features a more detailed representation of the lumbar spine that takes into account the dynamic curvature of the spine and measures compressive and shear loads at multiple lumbar levels.  
    This model was used to examine the spinal loads developed in 20 volunteers that performed pushing and pulling exertions at three different handle heights, at three hand force levels, and at two different handle degree of freedom conditions.
    Compressive loads were found to be below literature tolerance values at each level of the lumbar spine.  AP shear loads, however, were found to reach or exceed tolerance limits at the higher lumbar levels, identifying a possible mechanism for low back injury in pushing and pulling.  Overall, spinal loads were found to vary as a function of hand force level, handle height, and gender at each lumbar level for both pushing and pulling.

·              Open floor   
Questions for Gregory Knapik

 
Send mail to the webmaster with questions or comments about this web site.
Last modified: 10/26/05